“The issues which, for Bruce, were non-negotiable,” said Bruce’s biographer Tim Grass, “may be summarized as the reliability of the New Testament, the person and work of Christ, the Christian life as one of forgiveness and liberty as befits those who are being led by the Spirit, and the right and duty of every believer to use whatever gifts God has given them.” (F.F. Bruce: A Life, p. 217)
There were certainly other issues important to Bruce. One cannot help but be struck by his commitment to holy living. In commenting on 1 John, for instance, he said, “orthodoxy of doctrine is no substitute for righteousness of life. ‘Truth in the inward being’ (Psalm 51:6) is what God desires in His people, and where that is present, it will manifest itself in all the ways of life.” He then added, “If my reputation, my ‘public image,’ matters more to me than the glory of God or the well-being of my fellows, the ‘pretentiousness of life’ has become the object of my idol-worship.”
And Professor Bruce had a profound commitment to the integrity of God’s Word, not to theological presuppositions, so that he did not have to view the biblical text through a theological lens. When “one’s only commitment is to truth, one is free to follow the evidence wherever it leads,” he said, “in an atmosphere of free enquiry.” This is why he could say, “Since my field of study and teaching is text and exegesis, not dogmatic theology, I have always found it possible to maintain an objectivity of treatment. . . If I am asked to say what the biblical text means, my answer will be the same no matter who asks me. This is not a question of following the apostolic example of being all things to all men; it is a matter simply of being myself to all men.”